This website will be unavailable from Friday, April 26, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. through Monday, April 29, 2024 at 7:00 a.m. due to data center maintenance.

  81R168 KCR-F
 
  By: Ellis S.B. No. 116
 
 
 
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 
AN ACT
  relating to electronically recording certain interrogations and
  the admissibility of certain statements made by a juvenile or a
  criminal defendant.
         BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
         SECTION 1.  Chapter 2, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended by adding Article 2.31 to read as follows:
         Art. 2.31.  ELECTRONIC RECORDING OF INTERROGATIONS. (a)
  Each law enforcement agency in this state shall provide training
  concerning the technological aspects of electronically recording
  interrogations to peace officers and other employees of the law
  enforcement agency who interrogate criminal defendants or
  suspects, including juveniles.
         (b)  The Department of Public Safety shall adopt rules for
  providing funds or electronic recording equipment to law
  enforcement agencies in this state for the purpose of recording
  interrogations of criminal defendants or suspects, including
  juveniles.
         SECTION 2.  Section 2, Article 38.22, Code of Criminal
  Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
         Sec. 2.  (a) No written statement made by an accused as a
  result of custodial interrogation is admissible as evidence against
  the accused [him] in any criminal proceeding unless:
               (1)  it is shown on the face of the statement that:
                     (A) [(a)]  the accused, prior to making the
  statement, either received from a magistrate the warning provided
  in Article 15.17 of this code or received from the person to whom
  the statement is made a warning that:
                           (i)  the accused [(1) he] has the right to
  remain silent and not make any statement at all and that any
  statement the accused [he] makes may be used against the accused
  [him] at [his] trial;
                           (ii) [(2)]  any statement the accused [he]
  makes may be used as evidence against the accused [him] in court;
                           (iii)  the accused [(3) he] has the right to
  have a lawyer present to advise the accused [him] prior to and
  during any questioning;
                           (iv) [(4)]  if the accused [he] is unable to
  employ a lawyer, the accused [he] has the right to have a lawyer
  appointed to advise the accused [him] prior to and during any
  questioning; and
                           (v)  the accused [(5) he] has the right to
  terminate the interview at any time; and
                     (B) [(b)]  the accused, prior to and during the
  making of the statement, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
  waived the rights set out in the warning prescribed by Paragraph
  (A); and
               (2)  in the case of a criminal proceeding in which the
  accused is charged with a felony, an electronic recording that
  complies with the requirements of Section 3(a) is made of the
  custodial interrogation resulting in the statement [Subsection (a)
  of this section].
         (b)  Every electronic recording of a custodial
  interrogation, if any, resulting in a written statement must be
  preserved until such time as:
               (1)  the defendant's conviction for any offense
  relating to the statement is final, all direct appeals of the case
  are exhausted, and the time to file a petition for a writ of habeas
  corpus has expired; or
               (2)  the prosecution of the offense is barred by law.
         (c)  Notwithstanding Subsection (a)(2), a written statement
  made by an accused as a result of a custodial interrogation is
  admissible as evidence against the accused in a criminal proceeding
  if the requirements of Subsection (a)(1) are satisfied with respect
  to each portion of the written statement that is to be used as
  evidence. This subsection expires September 1, 2012.
         SECTION 3.  Section 3, Article 38.22, Code of Criminal
  Procedure, is amended by amending Subsections (a) and (b) and
  adding Subsection (f) to read as follows:
         (a)  No oral or sign language statement of an accused made as
  a result of custodial interrogation is [shall be] admissible
  against the accused in a criminal proceeding unless:
               (1)  an electronic recording, which may include motion
  picture, video tape, or other visual recording, is made of:
                     (A)  the statement; and
                     (B)  in the case of a criminal proceeding in which
  the accused is charged with a felony, the custodial interrogation
  resulting in the statement;
               (2)  prior to the statement but during the recording
  the accused is given the warning in [Subsection (a) of] Section 2(a) 
  [2 above] and the accused knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
  waives any rights set out in the warning;
               (3)  the recording device was capable of making an
  accurate recording, the operator was competent, and the recording
  is substantially accurate and has not been intentionally altered;
               (4)  all voices on the recording are identified; and
               (5)  not later than the 20th day before the date of the
  proceeding, the attorney representing the defendant is provided
  with a true, complete, and accurate copy of all recordings of the
  defendant made under this article.
         (b)  Every electronic recording of a custodial interrogation
  resulting in an oral or sign language statement, if any, and any
  statement made by an accused during a custodial interrogation must
  be preserved until such time as:
               (1)  the defendant's conviction for any offense
  relating to the statement [thereto] is final, all direct appeals of
  the case [therefrom] are exhausted, and the time to file a petition
  requesting a writ of habeas corpus has expired; or
               (2)  the prosecution of the offense [such offenses] is
  barred by law.
         (f)  Notwithstanding the requirement of Subsection (a)(1)(B)
  that in felony cases a recording be made of the custodial
  interrogation resulting in the statement, an oral or sign language
  statement made by an accused as a result of a custodial
  interrogation is admissible as evidence against the accused in a
  criminal proceeding if the requirements of Subsection (a) are
  otherwise satisfied with respect to each portion of the oral or sign
  language statement that is to be used as evidence.  This subsection
  expires September 1, 2012.
         SECTION 4.  Article 38.22, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
  amended by adding Section 9 to read as follows:
         Sec. 9.  A recording of a custodial interrogation made under
  Section 2(a)(2) or 3(a) is exempt from required public disclosure
  under Chapter 552, Government Code.
         SECTION 5.  Section 51.095, Family Code, is amended by
  amending Subsections (a), (c), and (f) and adding Subsections (g),
  (h), and (i) to read as follows:
         (a)  Notwithstanding Section 51.09, the statement of a child
  is admissible in evidence in any future proceeding concerning the
  matter about which the statement was given if:
               (1)  the statement is made in writing under a
  circumstance described by Subsection (d) and:
                     (A)  the statement shows that the child has at
  some time before the making of the statement received from a
  magistrate a warning that:
                           (i)  the child may remain silent and not make
  any statement at all and that any statement that the child makes may
  be used in evidence against the child;
                           (ii)  the child has the right to have an
  attorney present to advise the child either prior to any
  questioning or during the questioning;
                           (iii)  if the child is unable to employ an
  attorney, the child has the right to have an attorney appointed to
  counsel with the child before or during any interviews with peace
  officers or attorneys representing the state; and
                           (iv)  the child has the right to terminate
  the interview at any time;
                     (B)  and:
                           (i)  the statement must be signed in the
  presence of a magistrate by the child with no law enforcement
  officer or prosecuting attorney present, except that a magistrate
  may require a bailiff or a law enforcement officer if a bailiff is
  not available to be present if the magistrate determines that the
  presence of the bailiff or law enforcement officer is necessary for
  the personal safety of the magistrate or other court personnel,
  provided that the bailiff or law enforcement officer may not carry a
  weapon in the presence of the child; and
                           (ii)  the magistrate must be fully convinced
  that the child understands the nature and contents of the statement
  and that the child is signing the same voluntarily, and if a
  statement is taken, the magistrate must sign a written statement
  verifying the foregoing requisites have been met;
                     (C)  the child knowingly, intelligently, and
  voluntarily waives these rights before and during the making of the
  statement and signs the statement in the presence of a magistrate;
  [and]
                     (D)  the magistrate certifies that the magistrate
  has had the opportunity to view any recording made under Paragraph
  (E), has examined the child independent of any law enforcement
  officer or prosecuting attorney, except as required to ensure the
  personal safety of the magistrate or other court personnel, and has
  determined that the child understands the nature and contents of
  the statement and has knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily
  waived these rights; and
                     (E)  in the case of a proceeding in which it is
  alleged that the child engaged in conduct violating a penal law of
  the grade of felony, the interrogation, if any, of the child
  resulting in the statement is recorded by an electronic recording
  device, including a device that records images, and:
                           (i)  the recording device is capable of
  making an accurate recording, the operator of the device is
  competent to use the device, the recording is substantially
  accurate, and the recording has not been intentionally altered;
                           (ii)  each voice on the recording is
  identified; and
                           (iii)  not later than the 20th day before the
  date of the proceeding, the attorney representing the child is
  given a complete and accurate copy of each recording of the child
  made under this subdivision;
               (2)  the statement is made orally and the child makes a
  statement of facts or circumstances that are found to be true and
  tend to establish the child's guilt, such as the finding of secreted
  or stolen property, or the instrument with which the child states
  the offense was committed;
               (3)  the statement was res gestae of the delinquent
  conduct or the conduct indicating a need for supervision or of the
  arrest;
               (4)  the statement is made:
                     (A)  in open court at the child's adjudication
  hearing;
                     (B)  before a grand jury considering a petition,
  under Section 53.045, that the child engaged in delinquent conduct;
  or
                     (C)  at a preliminary hearing concerning the child
  held in compliance with this code, other than at a detention hearing
  under Section 54.01; or
               (5)  subject to Subsection (f), the statement is made
  orally under a circumstance described by Subsection (d) and the
  statement and, in the case of a proceeding in which it is alleged
  that the child engaged in conduct violating a penal law of the grade
  of felony, the interrogation, if any, of the child resulting in the
  statement are [is] recorded by an electronic recording device,
  including a device that records images, and:
                     (A)  before making the statement, the child is
  given the warning described by Subdivision (1)(A) by a magistrate,
  the warning is a part of the recording, and the child knowingly,
  intelligently, and voluntarily waives each right stated in the
  warning;
                     (B)  the recording device is capable of making an
  accurate recording, the operator of the device is competent to use
  the device, the recording is substantially accurate, and the
  recording has not been intentionally altered;
                     (C)  each voice on the recording is identified;
  and
                     (D)  not later than the 20th day before the date of
  the proceeding, the attorney representing the child is given a
  complete and accurate copy of each recording of the child made under
  this subdivision.
         (c)  An electronic recording [of a child's statement] made
  under Subsection (a)(1) or (a)(5) shall be preserved until all
  juvenile or criminal matters relating to any conduct referred to in
  the recording [statement] are final, including the exhaustion of
  all appeals, or barred from prosecution.
         (f)  A magistrate who provides the warnings required by
  Subsection (a)(5) for a recorded oral statement may, at the time the
  warnings are provided, request by speaking on the recording that
  the officer return [the child and the recording] to the magistrate
  at the conclusion of the process of questioning the child and the
  recording and, in the case of a proceeding in which it is alleged
  that the child engaged in conduct violating a penal law of the grade
  of felony, any recording of any other interrogation of the child
  resulting in the oral statement being recorded.  The magistrate may
  then view the recording or recordings with the child or have the
  child view the recording or recordings to enable the magistrate to
  determine whether the child's oral statements were given
  voluntarily.  The magistrate's determination of voluntariness
  shall be reduced to writing and signed and dated by the magistrate.  
  If a magistrate uses the procedure described by this subsection, a
  child's oral statement is not admissible unless the magistrate
  determines that the statement was given voluntarily.
         (g)  A recording of an interrogation made under Subsection
  (a)(1) or (a)(5) is exempt from required public disclosure under
  Chapter 552, Government Code.
         (h)  Notwithstanding the requirements of Subsections
  (a)(1)(E) and (a)(5) that a recording be made of the interrogation
  resulting in the statement, a statement that is made in writing or
  made orally under a circumstance described by Subsection (d) is
  admissible in any future proceeding concerning the matter about
  which the statement was given if:
               (1)  concerning a statement made in writing, the
  requirements of Subsections (a)(1)(A)-(D) are satisfied with
  respect to each portion of the statement that is to be used as
  evidence; or
               (2)  concerning a statement made orally, the
  requirements of Subsection (a)(5) are otherwise satisfied with
  respect to each portion of the statement that is to be used as
  evidence.
         (i)  Subsection (h) and this subsection expire September 1,
  2012.
         SECTION 6.  The Department of Public Safety shall begin
  adopting rules under Article 2.31(b), Code of Criminal Procedure,
  as added by this Act, not later than March 1, 2010.
         SECTION 7.  Article 38.22, Code of Criminal Procedure, as
  amended by this Act, and Section 51.095, Family Code, as amended by
  this Act, apply to the admissibility of a written, oral, or sign
  language statement that is made on or after the effective date of
  this Act. A written, oral, or sign language statement that is made
  before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in
  effect at the time that the statement was made, and that law is
  continued in effect for that purpose.
         SECTION 8.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2009.