| BILL ANALYSIS | 
| C.S.H.B. 503 | 
| By: Hernandez Luna | 
| Business & Industry | 
| Committee Report (Substituted) | 
| BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 
 Interested parties contend that a conflict of interest arises when a residential property owners' association board member enters into a contract that provides the member financial compensation. C.S.H.B. 503 seeks to remedy this concern by regulating such contracts. 
 | ||||||||||||||||
| RULEMAKING AUTHORITY 
 It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution. 
 | ||||||||||||||||
| ANALYSIS 
 C.S.H.B. 503 amends the Property Code to authorize certain property owners' associations, under certain conditions as specified in the bill, to enter into an enforceable contract with a current association board member, a person related to a current association board member within the third degree by consanguinity or affinity, or a company in which a current association board member or a person related to a current association board member within the third degree by consanguinity or affinity has a financial interest in at least 51 percent of the profits. 
 C.S.H.B. 503 exempts from its provisions a contract entered into by an association during a development period, defined in the bill as a period stated in a declaration during which a declarant reserves a right to facilitate the development, construction, and marketing of the subdivision and reserves a right to direct the size, shape, and composition of the subdivision. 
 | ||||||||||||||||
| EFFECTIVE DATE 
 September 1, 2013. 
 | ||||||||||||||||
| COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE 
 While C.S.H.B. 503 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and highlighted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill. 
 | ||||||||||||||||
| 
 
 
 |