| |
| |
|
|
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
|
|
|
AN ACT
|
|
|
relating to the state's burden of proof in certain asset forfeiture |
|
|
proceedings under the Code of Criminal Procedure. |
|
|
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: |
|
|
SECTION 1. Article 59.02, Code of Criminal Procedure, is |
|
|
amended by amending Subsection (c) and adding Subsection (c-1) to |
|
|
read as follows: |
|
|
(c) An owner or interest holder's interest in property may |
|
|
not be forfeited under this chapter if the owner or interest holder |
|
|
[proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the owner or
|
|
|
interest holder] acquired and perfected the interest: |
|
|
(1) before or during the act or omission giving rise to |
|
|
forfeiture or, if the property is real property, the owner or |
|
|
interest holder [he] acquired an ownership interest, security |
|
|
interest, or lien interest before a lis pendens notice was filed |
|
|
under Article 59.04(g), [of this code] and did not know or should |
|
|
not reasonably have known of the act or omission giving rise to the |
|
|
forfeiture or that it was likely to occur at or before the time of |
|
|
acquiring and perfecting the interest or, if the property is real |
|
|
property, at or before the time of acquiring the ownership |
|
|
interest, security interest, or lien interest; or |
|
|
(2) after the act or omission giving rise to the |
|
|
forfeiture, but before the seizure of the property, and only if the |
|
|
owner or interest holder: |
|
|
(A) was, at the time that the interest in the |
|
|
property was acquired, an owner or interest holder for value; and |
|
|
(B) was without reasonable cause to believe that |
|
|
the property was contraband and did not purposefully avoid learning |
|
|
that the property was contraband. |
|
|
(c-1) The state has the burden of proving by a preponderance |
|
|
of the evidence that the circumstances described by Subsection (c) |
|
|
do not apply to property that is subject to seizure and forfeiture |
|
|
under this chapter. |
|
|
SECTION 2. Article 59.02(h), Code of Criminal Procedure, is |
|
|
amended by amending Subdivision (1) and adding Subdivision (1-a) to |
|
|
read as follows: |
|
|
(1) An owner or interest holder's interest in property |
|
|
may not be forfeited under this chapter if [at the forfeiture
|
|
|
hearing the owner or interest holder proves by a preponderance of
|
|
|
the evidence that] the owner or interest holder was not a party to |
|
|
the offense giving rise to the forfeiture and [that] the |
|
|
contraband: |
|
|
(A) was stolen from the owner or interest holder |
|
|
before being used in the commission of the offense giving rise to |
|
|
the forfeiture; |
|
|
(B) was purchased with: |
|
|
(i) money stolen from the owner or interest |
|
|
holder; or |
|
|
(ii) proceeds from the sale of property |
|
|
stolen from the owner or interest holder; or |
|
|
(C) was used or intended to be used without the |
|
|
effective consent of the owner or interest holder in the commission |
|
|
of the offense giving rise to the forfeiture. |
|
|
(1-a) The state has the burden of proving by a |
|
|
preponderance of the evidence that the circumstances described by |
|
|
Subdivision (1) do not apply to property that is subject to seizure |
|
|
and forfeiture under this chapter. |
|
|
SECTION 3. The change in law made by this Act applies only |
|
|
to a forfeiture proceeding that begins on or after the effective |
|
|
date of this Act. A forfeiture proceeding that begins before the |
|
|
effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the |
|
|
date the proceeding begins, and the former law is continued in |
|
|
effect for that purpose. |
|
|
SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2017. |